Occasional Publications
An Independent Press Since 1986
Psalms
Two New Collections on Kanon/Canon
17 December 2007, 10:43 | Filed in: Book Notes
While it is still 2007 I felt I should mention two
new collections of essays on canon ("kanon" in the
German spelling). I've had the chance to work through
them both by now, and have just submitted a review of
the larger collection to RBL. Since it has to be
approved by the editors first, I expect it will not
appear there for a few months yet (but if you're
desperate for an English summary, feel free to
contact me).
The first to appear, in September, was Bernd Janowski, ed., Kanonhermeneutik: Vom Lesen und Verstehen der christlichen Bibel (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 2007). It contains essays from six contributors.
The first to appear, in September, was Bernd Janowski, ed., Kanonhermeneutik: Vom Lesen und Verstehen der christlichen Bibel (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener, 2007). It contains essays from six contributors.
The second to appear, in November, was Egbert
Ballhorn and Georg Steins, eds., Der Bibelkanon in der Bibelauslegung:
Beispielexegesen und
Methodenreflexionen (Stuttgart:
Kohlhammer, 2007). It contains 21 essays by 17
scholars. I quoted from this volume here
recently, and I will certainly link my review once
RBL processes it.
|
First Picks for SBL San Diego
06 November 2007, 14:49 | Filed in: HB/OT
Early tomorrow I depart for home (hooray! it's been
too long!), and I'm leaving the blog behind until I
get back from SBL. So with an eye to SBL already, I
offer a few top picks after a glance through the
program guide. It's massive, so I'm sure to have
missed something. The first things that stand out to
me fall into four groups:
The Brevard Childs session has collected quite a list of participants:
And a session for James Barr was more recently put together, with the following panelists:
In addition to my own session (and see a new translation of Psalm 102 on this site), I noticed two sessions in particular.
S19-83, Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity, in a joint session between Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity and Book of Psalms, meets 11/19/2007, 1:00 PM to 3:30 PM, Room: 28 D - CC. The Theme is Psalms in Judaism and Christianity: Studies in the History of Interpretation of the Psalter, and the schedule is:
A second joint session of the same groups, S19-126, also on Psalms in Early Judaism and Christianity, meets 11/19/2007, 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Room: 23 B - CC. Participants:
In this category session S17-28, Theological Interpretation and the Canon of Scripture, could go into two of my categories. Hopefully the separation from Sanders and McDonald (see below) will not truncate dialog between the groups. This session meets 11/17/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Manchester F - GH. The agenda is:
S17-82, on Christ in/and the Old Testament, is notable. It meets 11/17/2007, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM, Room: Cunningham - GH. The lineup is:
S17-130, on Reading the Book of Genesis Theologically as Christian Scripture, meets 11/17/2007, 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Room: 28 C - CC. Lineup:
S19-138 is a book review session of Christopher R. Seitz, Prophecy and Hermeneutics: Toward a New Introduction to the Prophets (Baker Academic, 2007), meeting 11/19/2007, 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM, Room: Santa Rosa - MM. Reviewers and respondent are:
Finally, S20-04, under Christian Theology and the Bible, considers New Proposals in Christian Theology and Bible. It meets 11/20/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Randle A - GH, and features:
I also just noticed an early session, S16-55, The Faith of Jesus Christ: Exegetical, Biblical and Theological Studies, which meets 11/16/2007, 12:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Room: 28 A - CC. On tap are:
The last of these three sessions is the one I'm most looking forward to, though as I say I hope the physical separation from the first session under Theological Exegesis, above, doesn't mean the groups wind up talking to themselves.
S17-25, Rethinking the Concept and Categories of 'Bible' in Antiquity, meets 11/17/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Salon 5 - MM. Participants:
S17-119, Orality, Textuality, and the Formation of the Hebrew Bible, meets 11/17/2007, 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Room: Del Mar A - GH, to discuss the theme Rethinking Business as Usual in Light of Orality and Textuality. On tap:
And finally, S19-16, Function of Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphal Writings in Early Judaism and Early Christianity (through 3rd to 4th centuries CE), meets 11/19/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Manchester H - GH, on the theme Theoretical Issues. The schedule is:
If you're going to be there, look for me and say hello.
- Giants of the Recent Past
- Psalms
- Theological Exegesis
- Canon
Giants of the Recent Past
The Brevard Childs session has collected quite a list of participants:
Christopher Seitz, Wycliffe College, University of Toronto, Presiding Gary Anderson, University of Notre Dame, Panelist Erhard Gerstenberger, Philipps Universität-Marburg, Panelist Richard Hays, Duke University, Panelist Alan Cooper, Jewish Theological Seminary of America, Panelist Kavin Rowe, Duke University, Panelist Mark Elliott, University of St. Andrews-Scotland, Panelist Ephraim Radner, Wycliffe College, University of Toronto, PanelistThat's 11/18/2007, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM, Room: 30 E - CC.
And a session for James Barr was more recently put together, with the following panelists:
Samuel Balentine, Union Theological Seminary and Presbyterian School of Christian Education, Presiding William Abraham, Southern Methodist University, Panelist Joseph Blenkinsopp, University of Notre Dame, Panelist Douglas Knight, Vanderbilt University, Panelist Archie Lee, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Panelist Mervyn Richardson, Leiden University-The Netherlands, PanelistMeets 11/19/2007, 1:00 PM to 3:30 PM, Room: Manchester A - GH.
Psalms
In addition to my own session (and see a new translation of Psalm 102 on this site), I noticed two sessions in particular.
S19-83, Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity, in a joint session between Scripture in Early Judaism and Christianity and Book of Psalms, meets 11/19/2007, 1:00 PM to 3:30 PM, Room: 28 D - CC. The Theme is Psalms in Judaism and Christianity: Studies in the History of Interpretation of the Psalter, and the schedule is:
Esther Menn, Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, Presiding Medieval Jewish Psalms Interpretation Adele Berlin, University of Maryland College Park, Panelist (30 min) Alan Cooper, Jewish Theological Seminary of America, Panelist (30 min) Moshe Bernstein, Yeshiva University, Respondent (10 min) Heidelberg Psalms Project Manfred Oeming, Panelist (20 min) Andreas Wagner, University of Heidelberg, Panelist (20 min) Joachim Vette, Panelist (20 min) Discussion (20 min)
A second joint session of the same groups, S19-126, also on Psalms in Early Judaism and Christianity, meets 11/19/2007, 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Room: 23 B - CC. Participants:
Rolf Jacobson, Luther Seminary, Presiding Scott R. A. Starbuck, Whitworth University Afterlives of Royal Psalm Lyrics (30 min) Tze-Ming Quek, University of Cambridge "I will Give Authority over the Nations": Psalm 2:8-9 in Revelatiom 2:26c-27 (30 min) Scot Becker, University of Aberdeen The Magnificat among the Biblical Inset Psalms (30 min) Aaron Canty, Saint Xavier University The Nuptial Imagery of Christ and the Church in Augustine's "Enarrationes in Psalmos" (30 min) Janet A. Timbie, Catholic University of America Psalm Recitation in the White Monastery (30 min)
Theological Exegesis
In this category session S17-28, Theological Interpretation and the Canon of Scripture, could go into two of my categories. Hopefully the separation from Sanders and McDonald (see below) will not truncate dialog between the groups. This session meets 11/17/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Manchester F - GH. The agenda is:
Edith Humphrey, Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, Presiding Stephen B. Chapman, Duke University The Canon Debate: What It Is and Why It Matters (20 min) Thomas Holsinger-Friesen, Spring Arbor University, Respondent (10 min) Discussion (15 min) Daniel J. Treier, Wheaton College A Looser "Canon"?: Relating William Abraham’s Canon and Criterion in Christian Theology to Biblical Interpretation (20 min) William Abraham, Southern Methodist University, Respondent (10 min) Discussion (15 min) Richard Paul Thompson, Northwest Nazarene University Scripture, Community, and Conversation: Rethinking Theological Interpretation Canonically (20 min) Jacqueline Lapsley, Princeton Theological Seminary, Respondent (10 min) Discussion (15 min)Papers were to be posted at http://fc.asburyseminary.edu/~theological_interpretation/index.html — but I can't get the link to work.
S17-82, on Christ in/and the Old Testament, is notable. It meets 11/17/2007, 1:00 PM to 3:00 PM, Room: Cunningham - GH. The lineup is:
Christopher Seitz, University of St. Andrews-Scotland, Presiding (10 min) Kathryn Greene-Mccreight, St John's Episcopal Church, Panelist (10 min) Robert Wall, Seattle Pacific University, Panelist (10 min) John Goldingay, Fuller Theological Seminary, Panelist (10 min) Christopher Wright, Langham Partnership International, Panelist (10 min) Murray Rae, University of Otago, Panelist (10 min) Discussion (45 min)
S17-130, on Reading the Book of Genesis Theologically as Christian Scripture, meets 11/17/2007, 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Room: 28 C - CC. Lineup:
Bill Arnold, Asbury Theological Seminary, Presiding J. Richard Middleton, Roberts Wesleyan College The Significance of the Call of Abraham (Genesis 12:1-3) for a Canonical Reading of Scripture (30 min) Discussion (15 min) R. R. Reno, Creighton University Satan, Temptation, and the Fall (30 min) Discussion (15 min) Jeffrey L. Morrow, University of Dayton Genesis 1-3 in a Liturgical Context: The Role of Liturgy in Christian Theological Interpretation of Scripture (30 min) Discussion (15 min)
S19-138 is a book review session of Christopher R. Seitz, Prophecy and Hermeneutics: Toward a New Introduction to the Prophets (Baker Academic, 2007), meeting 11/19/2007, 7:00 PM to 8:30 PM, Room: Santa Rosa - MM. Reviewers and respondent are:
Gary Anderson, University of Notre Dame, Presiding Martti Nissinen, University of Helsinki, Panelist David Petersen, Emory University, Panelist Marvin Sweeney, Claremont School of Theology, Panelist Christopher Seitz, University of St. Andrews-Scotland, Respondent
Finally, S20-04, under Christian Theology and the Bible, considers New Proposals in Christian Theology and Bible. It meets 11/20/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Randle A - GH, and features:
Stephen Fowl, Loyola College in Maryland , Presiding (10 min) Mark Elliott, University of St. Andrews-Scotland Theological Insights on and from Leviticus 1-7 (30 min) Gregory W. Lee, Duke University Calvin and the New Perspective: Covenant as Ground for a Nuanced View of the Law (30 min) Break (10 min) Clayton Libolt, River Terrace Church A Conversation with Nicholas Wolterstorff's Divine Discourse (30 min) George C. Heider, Valparaiso University Atonement and the Gospels (30 min)
I also just noticed an early session, S16-55, The Faith of Jesus Christ: Exegetical, Biblical and Theological Studies, which meets 11/16/2007, 12:30 PM to 5:30 PM, Room: 28 A - CC. On tap are:
Michael Bird, Highland Theological College The Faith of Jesus Christ: Problems and Prospects (15 min) Stanley Porter, McMaster Divinity College Lexical and Semantic Reflections on Pistis (30 min) Douglas Campbell, Duke University The Faithfulness of Jesus Christ in Romans and Galatians (30 min) Preston Sprinkle, Aberdeen University Pistis Christou as an Eschatological Event (30 min) Break (15 min) Ardel Caneday, Northwestern College, St. Paul The Faithfulness of Jesus as a Theme of Pauline Theology (30 min) Francis Watson, University of Aberdeen - Scotland The Faith of Jesus Christ (30 min) R. Barry Matlock, University of Sheffield The Faithfulness of Jesus Christ in Romans and Galatians (30 min) Mark Elliott, University of St. Andrews-Scotland The Faith of Jesus Christ in the Church Fathers (30 min) Benjamin Myers, University of Queensland The Faithfulness of Christ in the Theology of Karl Barth (30 min)
Canon
The last of these three sessions is the one I'm most looking forward to, though as I say I hope the physical separation from the first session under Theological Exegesis, above, doesn't mean the groups wind up talking to themselves.
S17-25, Rethinking the Concept and Categories of 'Bible' in Antiquity, meets 11/17/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Salon 5 - MM. Participants:
James E. Bowley, Millsaps College, Presiding K. L. Noll, Brandon University Rethinking Literary Function in the Emerging Hebrew Canon (25 min) Francis Borchardt, University of Helsinki Concepts of Scripture in 1 Maccabees (25 min) Ian W. Scott, Tyndale Seminary Is the Bible always Scripture?: The "Low" View of the Pentateuch in the Letter of Aristeas (25 min) Sara Parks, McGill University and Aaron Ricker, McGill University Harry Potter Canon Discourse and the Biblical Canons (25 min) Robert A. Kraft, University of Pennsylvania Finding Adequate Terminology for "Pre-canonical" Literatures (25 min) James E. Bowley, Millsaps College Terminating Terminology (25 min)
S17-119, Orality, Textuality, and the Formation of the Hebrew Bible, meets 11/17/2007, 4:00 PM to 6:30 PM, Room: Del Mar A - GH, to discuss the theme Rethinking Business as Usual in Light of Orality and Textuality. On tap:
Susan Niditch, Amherst College, Presiding Joachim Schaper, University of Aberdeen The Textualisation of Israelite Religion in the Context of the "Orality and Literacy" Debate (30 min) Frank Polak, Tel Aviv University The Voiced Text in the Hebrew Bible: From Epic Song to Biblical Narrative and Midrashic Exegesis (30 min) William M. Schniedewind, University of California-Los Angeles Rethinking Inner-biblical Exegesis and Biblical Criticism in Light of Orality & Textuality (30 min) Werner H. Kelber, Rice University Implications of the Oral-Scribal Approach to Tanach Studies (30 min) Discussion (30 min)
And finally, S19-16, Function of Apocryphal and Pseudepigraphal Writings in Early Judaism and Early Christianity (through 3rd to 4th centuries CE), meets 11/19/2007, 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, Room: Manchester H - GH, on the theme Theoretical Issues. The schedule is:
Lee Martin McDonald, Acadia Divinity College, Presiding James A. Sanders, Ancient Biblical Manuscript Center Non-Masoretic Literature in Early Judaism and its Function in the New Testament (20 min) Craig Evans, Acadia Divinity College, Respondent (5 min) Discussion (5 min) James H. Charlesworth, Princeton Theological Seminary The Book of the People from the People of the Book (20 min) Discussion (5 min) Lee Martin McDonald, Acadia Divinity College What Do We Mean by "Canon"?: A Look at Some Ancient and Modern Questions (20 min) Loren Johns, Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminary, Respondent (5 min) Discussion (5 min) Ken M. Penner, Acadia Divinity College Citation Formulae as Indices to Canonicity in Early Jewish and Early Christian Literature (20 min) Jonathan Soyars, Princeton Theological Seminary, Respondent (5 min) Discussion (5 min) Sarah L. Schwarz, Haverford College Pseudepigrapha Among the Pagans?: Exploring the Boundaries of Audience (20 min) Discussion (5 min)
If you're going to be there, look for me and say hello.
R. Alter's Translation of Psalm 102
SBL in San Diego is fast approaching, particularly as
I travel that way early to see my family and home
state (Oregon) for the first time in ages. My paper on
Psalm 102 (or read the proposal) is nearly ready, and
for those of you who may wish to acquaint
yourselves with the subject matter, I post below
Robert Alter's new
translation of the psalm in question.
My only question: I get why you'd want to keep as much of the ancient character in the translation as possible, but does "Yah" in verse 19 really count as a translation? Seems like punting.
1 A prayer for the lowly when he grows faint and pours out his plea before the LORD.
2 LORD, O hear my prayer,
and let my outcry come before You.
3 Hide not Your face from me
on the day when I am in straits.
Incline Your ear to me.
On the day I call, quickly answer me.
4 For my days are consumed in smoke,
and my bones are scorched like a hearth.
5 My heart is stricken and withers like grass,
so I forget to eat my bread.
6 From my loud sighing,
my bones cleave to my flesh.
7 I resemble the wilderness jackdaw,
I become like the owl of the ruins.
8 I lie awake and become
like a lonely bird on a roof.
9 All day long my enemies revile me,
my taunters invoke me in curse.
10 For ashes I have eaten as bread,
and my drink I have mingled with tears—
11 because of Your wrath and Your fury,
for You raised me up and flung me down.
12 My days inclined like a shadow,
and I—like grass I withered.
13 And You LORD, forever enthroned,
and Your name—for all generations.
14 You, may You rise, have mercy on Zion,
for it is the hour to pity her, for the fixed time has come.
15 For Your servants cherish her stones
and on her dust they take pity.
16 All the nations will fear the name of the LORD,
and all the kings of the earth, Your glory.
17 For the LORD has rebuilt Zion,
He is seen in His glory.
18 He has turned to the prayer of the desolate
and has not despised their prayer.
19 Let this be inscribed for a generation to come,
that a people yet unborn may praise Yah.
20 For the LORD has gazed down from His holy heights,
from heaven to earth He has looked
21 to hears the groans of the captive,
to set loose those doomed to die,
22 that the name of the LORD be recounted in Zion
and His praise in Jerusalem
23 when peoples gather together
and kingdoms, to serve the LORD.
24 He humbled my strength on the highway,
he cut short my days.
25 I say, “O my God.
Do not take me away in the midst of my days!
Your years are for all generations.
26 Of old You founded the earth,
and the heavens—Your handiwork.
27 They will perish and You will yet stand.
They will all wear away like a garment.
Like clothing you change them, and they pass away.
28 But You—Your years never end.
29 The sons of Your servants dwell safe,
their seed in Your presence, unshaken.”
My only question: I get why you'd want to keep as much of the ancient character in the translation as possible, but does "Yah" in verse 19 really count as a translation? Seems like punting.
Traditional Readings of Psalm 102
I'm still digging into Psalm 102 for my upcoming SBL
paper. Today I left the dusty library shelves and
turned instead to a few online resources.
Commentators of note include:
- Augustine (and here and here in the Confessions)
- Thomas (OK, not yet to 102, but mentioned here etc)
- Calvin (esp here and here; cf Gn 36, 25, Ex 15, 32, Lam 5, Is 16, 29, 37, 49, 51, 54, 63, 66, Jonah, Dn 2, 7, Jer 19, 31, Ps 22, 51, 72, 114, 109, and here, here, here, etc)
- Adolf Harnack on Athanasius
- Metered by Isaac Watts
- Calvin and Augustine are also here
Make that Kugel, Alter on my desk!
12 October 2007, 17:18 | Filed in: HB/OT
After a fortnight of long days, and in them the
sudden onset of a cold, my Friday afternoon was
brightened when a postal worker knocked and handed me
a package from Amazon. (It's the first mail I've
received since the postal strikes.) Couldn't guess
what it was—it had been routed through Germany and
I'm pretty much the only one in the house who orders
German books—and was most pleased when it turned out
to be copies of the two books I last blogged about.
I've only glanced at them now, but they look well
worth the time I want to give them. I may say a word
about them later if I get the chance.
Most of all thanks to fuller (my dad, and undoubtedly this blog's longest standing reader). It was a most thoughtful gift.
Most of all thanks to fuller (my dad, and undoubtedly this blog's longest standing reader). It was a most thoughtful gift.
Kugel, Alter in Mainstream Media
James Kugel and Robert Alter, two of the most notable
American Hebraists working today, have both surfaced
in mainstream media publications recently. (This via
PaleoJudaica, which mentioned the stories here and here [compare here].)
The New York Times reviewed James Kugel's gargantuan How to Read the Bible on Saturday. Kugel, who calls himself and American and a Zionist, and who proved his conviction by relocating from Harvard to the Orthodox Bar-Ilan Univeristy outside Tel Aviv (he says he did it for the tomatoes), has started a web site in connection with the new book, www.jameskugel.com. The site is a work in progress, though it does already contain an appendix on "Apologetics and Biblical Criticism."
The NYT review focuses on Kugel's thesis that "ancient interpreters" and "modern scholars" have interpreted the Bible in radically different ways.
Yesterday, NPR's All Things Considered (one of the things I miss most about commuting in the US of A) broadcast Robert Siegel's interview of Robert Alter, about his new translation of the Psalms. In the interview Alter explains why "soul" is a bad translation of "nephesh." Translations can be "like those thick layers of veneer that were put down on paintings in the Victorian period so you couldn't see the true colors." They impose later ideas about the division of body and soul, or about the soul surviving after death, onto the ancient text. "I scrupulously avoided 'soul' in order not to give the wrong impression."
Alter also reads Psalm 8, drawing attention to translation choices that aim to preserve the strong rhythms and compactness of the original Hebrew. He comments about the strange mythical language preserved in Psalm 82, which has God among the gods. "Our God, the big guy, presides over the assembly." He summarizes the message to the small-g gods: "You're going to be demoted to human status because you haven't done your job of administering justice."
Listen to the entire interview. It's not long. NPR also includes an excerpt of Alter's translation and commentary on Psalm 23.
Very much looking forward to browsing both books when I can get my hands on them.
POST SCRIPT (20 Sept): Kugel's online appendix is worth reading. In it he actually goes after Alter a bit (similarly Jon Levenson, whose Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son I reviewed just last night), proving that the alignment which brought them together here does not entail alignment in other matters—obviously.
Professor Kugel, if you should happen to find this, thank you for your efforts on your web page, especially for publishing some real content there.
The New York Times reviewed James Kugel's gargantuan How to Read the Bible on Saturday. Kugel, who calls himself and American and a Zionist, and who proved his conviction by relocating from Harvard to the Orthodox Bar-Ilan Univeristy outside Tel Aviv (he says he did it for the tomatoes), has started a web site in connection with the new book, www.jameskugel.com. The site is a work in progress, though it does already contain an appendix on "Apologetics and Biblical Criticism."
The NYT review focuses on Kugel's thesis that "ancient interpreters" and "modern scholars" have interpreted the Bible in radically different ways.
Charles Augustine Briggs, a 19th-century pioneer of modern biblical scholarship, declared that by sweeping away the “rubbish” of centuries of biblical interpretation, modern scholars would finally “recover the real Bible.” Professor Kugel admires the audacity and genius of scholars like Briggs, but he believes that in their contempt for the “rubbish” of ancient interpretation, modern scholars have let the “real Bible” elude them. They have been left, instead, with “the raw material that made up the Bible.”The reviewer wonders if the two approaches have to be seen as irreconcilable. Given this summary, I imagine I can see why Kugel was among the few who came to the Childs session in Vienna this summer (mentioned near the end of this post).
Yesterday, NPR's All Things Considered (one of the things I miss most about commuting in the US of A) broadcast Robert Siegel's interview of Robert Alter, about his new translation of the Psalms. In the interview Alter explains why "soul" is a bad translation of "nephesh." Translations can be "like those thick layers of veneer that were put down on paintings in the Victorian period so you couldn't see the true colors." They impose later ideas about the division of body and soul, or about the soul surviving after death, onto the ancient text. "I scrupulously avoided 'soul' in order not to give the wrong impression."
Alter also reads Psalm 8, drawing attention to translation choices that aim to preserve the strong rhythms and compactness of the original Hebrew. He comments about the strange mythical language preserved in Psalm 82, which has God among the gods. "Our God, the big guy, presides over the assembly." He summarizes the message to the small-g gods: "You're going to be demoted to human status because you haven't done your job of administering justice."
Listen to the entire interview. It's not long. NPR also includes an excerpt of Alter's translation and commentary on Psalm 23.
Very much looking forward to browsing both books when I can get my hands on them.
POST SCRIPT (20 Sept): Kugel's online appendix is worth reading. In it he actually goes after Alter a bit (similarly Jon Levenson, whose Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son I reviewed just last night), proving that the alignment which brought them together here does not entail alignment in other matters—obviously.
Professor Kugel, if you should happen to find this, thank you for your efforts on your web page, especially for publishing some real content there.
Psalm 102 paper for SBL
I am slotted to give a paper in San Diego on 17
November 2007. My focus is on a few verses towards
the middle of Psalm 102. Full details for the
session, including links to abstracts, are as
follows.
11/17/2007
William Bellinger, Baylor
University, Presiding
Daniel R. Driver, University of St. Andrews
For a Generation to Come: The Addressee of Psalm 102 in Reception and Recent Research (30 min)
Robert E. Wallace, Shorter College
Back to the Beginning: Yahweh as King, Moses as Mediator and Psalms 104-106 (30 min)
Judith Gärtner, Universität Hamburg
The Tora in Psalm 106 and Psalm 136 (30 min)
Jinkyu Kim, Nyack College
Strategic Arrangement of Royal Psalms in the Last Two Books of the Psalter (30 min)
Charles Rix, Drew University
Note the Silence: Reading Psalm 137 Through Messiaen and Bak (30 min)
Since my proposal was supposed to have a paragraph break in it, and since what else is a blog for?, and since it'll be good to keep the thing out in front of me as November approaches, here's my proposal/abstract:
Obviously, the whole thing is kinda supposed to relate to the last chapter of my dissertation.
S17-108
Book of Psalms
11/17/2007
4:00 PM to 6:30 PM
Room: Windsor BC - GH
William Bellinger, Baylor
University, Presiding
Daniel R. Driver, University of St. Andrews
For a Generation to Come: The Addressee of Psalm 102 in Reception and Recent Research (30 min)
Robert E. Wallace, Shorter College
Back to the Beginning: Yahweh as King, Moses as Mediator and Psalms 104-106 (30 min)
Judith Gärtner, Universität Hamburg
The Tora in Psalm 106 and Psalm 136 (30 min)
Jinkyu Kim, Nyack College
Strategic Arrangement of Royal Psalms in the Last Two Books of the Psalter (30 min)
Charles Rix, Drew University
Note the Silence: Reading Psalm 137 Through Messiaen and Bak (30 min)
Since my proposal was supposed to have a paragraph break in it, and since what else is a blog for?, and since it'll be good to keep the thing out in front of me as November approaches, here's my proposal/abstract:
In recent years, some attention has been paid to Psalm 102 by scholars interested in the canon’s final form, though in very different ways. Odil Steck, for instance, has argued not just that the psalm be read as a whole (contra an older form-critical understanding), but that its singularity be explained with reference to a body of scripture largely extant at the time of its composition. For him, the psalm arises at a late redactional phase in the formation of the canon, testifying to the confluence of distinctive prophetic and sapiential streams of tradition. Somewhat differently, Brevard Childs has discussed Psalm 102 as an instance of the authority scripture increasingly accrued in textualized form: it was “recorded for a generation to come” (19a). Despite fairly substantial disagreements in a number of areas—including about the place of intentionality as such—Steck and Childs agree that the intended audience is in the remote future. On analogy with late prophecy, perhaps, the generation addressed is not near, but distant; in Steck’s word, the psalm voices “Fernerwartung.”
The burden of the present paper is to query the history of reception of Psalm 102, particularly verse 19, to see whether there is any “family resemblance” (Childs) with these more recent interpretations. Which generations have been found in the psalmist’s purview? The results may have an important bearing on Childs’s program, which has long sought to hold the history of interpretation together with modern research (most recently, cf. The Struggle to Understand Isaiah as Christian Scripture). If preoccupation with an original cultic context is a modern oddity, what can be said for the theory of a radicalized eschatology?
Obviously, the whole thing is kinda supposed to relate to the last chapter of my dissertation.

